Company coverage through the governance lens
How to read the scores: the Company Risk Rating, Financial Stability Rating and Health Status Rating share one 1 to 5 scale: 5 Benchmark, 4 Excellent, 3 Good, 2 Caution, 1 Risk. The Economic Sustainability Rating runs the other way, so a lower reading is better. How the ratings work

Articles
-

Who is Kevin Lobo? Stryker’s chief executive is handing over the company, but not the chair
· 6 min readKevin Lobo hands Stryker's CEO role to Spencer Stiles on 1 January 2027 and becomes Executive Chair. What changes on the board, and what to watch.
-

Do strong governance and stability ratings go with better returns? Three years, 30 companies, one test
· 9 min readInsidEntity’s ratings are meant to flag risk, not forecast returns, so we tested them on both. We took 15 companies rated strong on governance and financial stability, and 15 rated weak on both, as at 9 September 2026. We put a simulated US$500 into each at the close on 29 September 2023 and followed them…
-

The Number Behind the Number | 06 MTN
· 8 min readMTN grew about 40% in two years in its own currencies. In rand, it grew 4%. The 2025 results taken apart, with the Company Risk Rating and Financial Stability Rating in full.
-

Who is Pony Ma? Tencent’s co-founder has run it for 28 years, as chairman and chief executive
· 5 min readPony Ma co-founded Tencent in 1998 and is still its chairman, CEO and only executive director. A governance lens on his roles, board and succession.
-

South Africa’s Listed Banks: Three Lenses on Six Banks
· 9 min readSix JSE-listed banks through three lenses: valuation from 0.95 to 8.7 times book, uneven earnings, and governance ratings that rank them differently.
-

The Number Behind the Number | 05 HSBC
· 8 min readHSBC made US$29.9bn in 2025 and its Hong Kong bank booked 65.5% of it. Where the profit sits, what Hang Seng Bank cost, and the auditor clock.
-

Fifteen companies worth US$1 trillion. Only one rates Excellent.
· 6 min readFifteen companies are worth US$1 trillion or more. Their Company Risk Ratings: one Excellent, thirteen Good, one Caution. Why the auditor clock caps twelve.
-

Silicon Valley Bank: The Losses Were in the Notes to a Clean Audit
· 13 min readA $15.1bn unrecognised loss sat beside SVB's $16.3bn of equity in audited accounts. What the public record showed before the run and what the rating scores.
-

The Number Behind the Number | 04 BHP
· 8 min readCopper earned 48% more for BHP in FY2026 while production fell 3%. Where the gain came from: price, by-product credits and a US$0.32 unit cost.
-

The Number Behind the Number | 03 Apple
· 9 min readApple's EPS rose 224% in ten years while net income rose 110%. The difference is a 35% smaller share count, and buybacks that exceed free cash flow.
-

The 2026 IPO Test: SpaceX, Cerebras, Dangote and the new IPO cycle
· 12 min readSpaceX, Cerebras, China Resources New Energy, Dangote, Airtel Money, OpenAI and Anthropic run through the five questions of The IPO Test.
-

The Number Behind the Number | 02 Remgro
· 10 min readRupert Beleggings' B shares are 7% of Remgro's shares but carry 43% of its votes. Why the size of a holding and the size of a voice are not the same.
-

Who is Subramanian Sarma? The engineer who built L&T’s hydrocarbon business now oversees its core EPC businesses
· 5 min readSubramanian Sarma has sat on L&T's board since 2015 and now oversees its core EPC businesses as Deputy MD & President. His board record and what to watch.
-

Global debt tops $365 trillion: an ESR outlook on six economies
· 13 min readGlobal debt tops $365 trillion. InsidEntity's ESR reads six economies: five sit in Benchmark, while South Africa is one inflation print from Unsustainable.
-

The Number Behind the Number | 01 Naspers
· 8 min readNaspers reported US$11.6bn in profit for FY2026. Excluding Tencent's dividend, free cash flow was US$253m. The number behind the number.
-

Moody’s rated Standard Bank and Nedbank in one sentence. The audit clock decides which one leads.
· 8 min readMoody's gave Standard Bank and Nedbank the same Ba2 rating. On governance, Nedbank leads 4.37 to 3.88, and one auditor rotation could reverse that.
-

Nissan’s Board Said Motoo Nagai Was Independent. Its Shareholders Disagreed.
· 12 min readNissan's board judged a long-serving outside director independent. Two proxy advisers and its largest alliance partner disagreed, and so did shareholders.
-

AVI made more money. The balance sheet tells the better story.
· 14 min readRevenue rose 1.4% and net debt fell 26.4%. Why AVI's board could return about R1.02 billion to shareholders, and why its two ratings differ.
-

Frasers nearly doubled its Hugo Boss stake and took the chair. The Shareholder Influence pillar would not move.
· 14 min readFrasers Group lifted its Hugo Boss stake from 26.06% to 47.89% and its CEO became chair. Why the Shareholder Influence pillar reads 4.50 either way.
-

Japan’s ESR has not moved in three months. Its central bank just raised rates to a 31-year high.
· 11 min readJapan's Economic Sustainability Rating held at 5 as the Bank of Japan raised rates to a 31-year high. The rating is not stale; it measures something else.
Presentations
-

Companies with the Highest Financial Risk: 140 companies rated below 2 on financial stability
· 1 min read140 companies on the InsidEntity Platform are rated below 2 out of 5 on financial stability. Edition 01 names every one, lowest first, with its governance rating alongside.
-

After Apple named its next CEO. The single open item on our governance Watch List just closed.
· 2 min readApple named John Ternus CEO, succeeding Tim Cook on 1 September 2026, resolving the one item flagged on our Magnificent 7 governance Watch List.
Frequently asked questions
How the ratings work
Why rate companies with a fixed methodology?
Because headlines are hindsight. Enron, Steinhoff, FTX and Silicon Valley Bank all looked fine in the news until they did not, and ordinary people lost their hard-earned money investing blindly. InsidEntity was built on a simple promise: never again. Risk mitigation sits at the center of the platform, and a fixed methodology is how it delivers. Every company is scored on the same yardstick, so weakness shows up as a comparable number before it becomes a headline.
How is the Company Risk Rating (CRR) calculated?
The CRR scores a company from 0 (Unknown, not yet assessed) to 5 (Benchmark: an independent company with capacity), with 1 (Risk) the lowest assessed score, across four weighted pillars. Director Independence (40%) is scored from six independence questions answered for every board member. Director Capacity (20%) is based on genuine working experience and the number of board seats each director holds. Auditor Independence (20%) scores zero once an audit firm has been in office for more than 10 years. Shareholder Influence (20%) reflects the number of shareholders and whether any single holder controls 20% or more of the shares.
How often do ratings change?
The ratings are dynamic and update continuously, as company and country data changes and with the passing of time: a board appointment, an auditor crossing the 10-year mark, or a shift in significant shareholding all move the score. The Health Status runs on a fixed clock. Companies must re-declare every quarter, and if they do not, the score automatically resets to zero at quarter end. Silence is treated as a signal.
What affects a rating the most?
Director Independence carries the largest weight at 40%. Beyond the weights, the methodology has hard tripwires: a director holding five or more board seats scores zero on capacity, and an audit firm in office beyond ten years scores zero on independence. That auditor clock has already cost HSBC an Excellent rating.
What are the ESR and the Health Status?
They are the condition checks around the core rating. The Health Status is a quarterly self-declaration by the company against ten questions, scored out of 5, with signed declarations uploadable for transparency, and an automatic reset to zero if a company stops updating. The Economic Sustainability Rate (ESR) rates the country a company operates in, built from inflation and unemployment, and lower is better: 1 to 25 is Benchmark, 26 to 50 Efficient, 51 to 100 Stable, 101 to 150 Inefficient, and above 150 is Risk. A benchmark ESR means a stable environment; a high one means dig deeper before committing.
Why focus on three leading indicators?
Together they cover the three places risk actually lives: how the company is governed (the CRR, built on the three governance spheres of the Board of Directors, the Auditors and the Shareholders), what condition it is in right now (Health Status), and where it operates (ESR). Financial statements are lagging indicators; they tell you what already happened. These signals move first, and a handful of proven ones beats a dashboard of twenty noisy ones.
How does this help me make a better investment decision?
Every money decision, from buying shares to choosing a fund, a bank or a pension, comes down to the same questions: is this company legitimate, is it viable, and will it still exist tomorrow? The ratings turn those questions into comparable scores, so you never have to go into an investment blindly. You can see where to ask harder questions before committing, and keep monitoring what you already own. That is the idea behind the motto Know your entity: to inform, alert and empower the public, and to change how the world sees governance. It is independent research support, not personalised financial advice; the decision stays yours.
